16 October 2026, Rome: India’s agrochemical industry has avoided a potential setback to its pesticide export business after an international chemical review panel declined to recommend new trade restrictions on three insecticides widely manufactured in the country. The Pesticide Manufacturers and Formulators Association of India (PMFAI) said this week that the 22nd meeting of the Chemical Review Committee (CRC-22) under the Rotterdam Convention, held in Rome from September 15 to 18, 2026, did not list profenofos, phenthoate, or quinalphos for inclusion under the treaty’s Annex III.
Annex III listing would have triggered the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) procedure, a mechanism that requires exporting countries to get explicit consent from importing countries before shipping a listed chemical. Industry groups view PIC listing as a reputational and administrative burden that can slow trade and invite additional scrutiny of a molecule, even when the listing itself is not a ban.
A PMFAI delegation led by Dr. K.N. Singh of Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and Dr. Samir Dave of AIMCO Pesticides Ltd. took part in the Rome meeting alongside Indian government representatives from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, and the Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. All three molecules had been carried over from the previous year’s CRC-21 meeting, where the committee had been unable to complete its review.
What the Committee Decided
The three insecticides, all originally flagged for review based on regulatory action in Malaysia, received three different outcomes at the meeting:
Profenofos: Deferred rather than rejected outright. Committee members could not agree on whether the molecule met one of the Rotterdam Convention’s listing criteria, the requirement that a risk evaluation reflect prevailing conditions of use in the notifying country. The Convention’s Bureau will decide whether it returns to a future agenda.
Phenthoate: No further action. Malaysia’s regulatory notification relied on a generic maximum residue limit rather than a substance-specific one, which did not meet the relevant criterion.
Quinalphos: No further action, for the same reason as phenthoate. Malaysia had also not conducted a formal exposure assessment for the molecule.
None of the three chemicals advances toward Annex III listing at this stage, though profenofos could resurface in a future CRC cycle depending on the Bureau’s decision.
Why This Matters for Agribusiness
Profenofos, phenthoate, and quinalphos are all organophosphate insecticides with established manufacturing bases in India, used mainly on cotton and other field crops. India is one of the world’s largest producers and exporters of generic agrochemical technical materials and formulations, and Indian manufacturers routinely compete on molecules that have fallen off patent in Europe and the United States.
A Rotterdam Convention listing does not ban a chemical, but it adds a compliance layer to cross-border trade and can accelerate import restrictions in some markets, so avoiding it preserves existing export channels for Indian producers without any change in regulatory status at home.
For global agribusiness buyers and formulators who source technical-grade actives from India, the outcome means no near-term disruption to supply chains built around these three molecules, though the deferred status of profenofos means the issue is not permanently closed and could return to the international agenda within the next year or two.
Global Agriculture is an independent international media platform covering agri-business, policy, technology, and sustainability. For editorial collaborations, thought leadership, and strategic communications, write to pr@global-agriculture.com
